Sunday 25 August 2024

46. Glenda Jackson in 'A Touch of Class' (1973)


Plot intro

Steve Blackburn (George Segal) is a married American businessman living and working in London with his wife and two children. One day he meets divorced fashion designer Vickie Allessio (Glenda Jackson) who also has two children. The two hit it off and head off to Malaga to have an affair, but things get tricky when Steve has to continuously balance social events with his wife, business affairs, and the blossoming love between him and Vickie.


Paul says...

When you get right down to it, A Touch of Class is the ‘70s version of Brief Encounter. Indeed, the romantic ‘40s classic pops up in a funny but affecting scene in which our two lovers shed copious amounts of tears over the finale. But while Brief Encounter is a heartbreaking, frightfully posh and strictly chaste tale of two happily married people falling in love (Celia Johnson and Trevor Howard never so much as kiss), A Touch of Class follows a different path, with more frank, explicit discussions of sex, and a more lighthearted perspective on extra-marital affairs. 


We’re well into the '70s now, an era when sex, violence and drugs became much more prevalent in film-making. So it’s a relief to have a comedy thrown at us and even by today’s standards it has a naughty, provocative nature to it. Vickie, being divorced, has much less to lose in this affair. The most she has to do is find a sitter for her children and pets. But rather than the reckless, vulnerable character you might expect, Glenda Jackson infuses authority, sexual dominance and brutal honesty into her. What makes Vickie so endearing is that she knows exactly what she wants - no-strings-attached fun, and if she falls in love then so be it. She is probably the archetypal second-wave feminist- she has power over her body, authority over her male partner, a career, a go-getting attitude to life, and a friendly, open-minded attitude. Much of my enjoyment of this film came from Vickie’s relentless capability, a big change from Celia Johnson’s comparatively weepy performance in Brief Encounter.


Conversely, it is the man, Steve, who is frazzled, indecisive, emotional and erratic and ends up causing some of the more chaotic plot points. Examples include his and Vickie’s difficulty in getting a car and a room in Malaga, or Steve having to feign bladder trouble in order to race from the Royal Albert Hall for a quickie in Soho and back again. Even his wife is a serene, pleasant, capable human being. Writers often like to present the wife as shrill, demanding, and cruel to justify the husband’s affair but not so here. Much of the film is dedicated to Steve’s desperate attempts to have a sexy, glamorous, wild time with his mistress, all of which become complicated or foiled by chance encounters with colleagues, social events with his family, or his own silly mistakes. It is refreshing to see these stereotypical gender roles reversed, with Vickie, though far from being an emotionless robot, displaying more strength and fortitude than Steve. Indeed, it is Steve’s chaotic indecision that leads to the affair coming to an end and even though she is heartbroken, Vickie remains resolute and knows exactly what action to take in her life. 


This is a far better example of Glenda Jackson’s acting skills than her first Oscar win in Women In Love. The story here is more coherent and, most importantly, more fun. There are loads of laugh-out-loud moments in what is a tribute to ‘30s screwball comedies (references to It Happened One Night and His Girl Friday were used in the film’s marketing and Cary Grant himself was initially in talks to come out of retirement and play Steve). Jackson encapsulates the comedy as well as the dignity and strength of comedic actresses from an earlier era such as Claudette Colbert, Katharine Hepburn and Rosalind Russell, combining it with a subtle tenderness that humanises her. This is epitomised in one scene when Vickie is on the phone at work. Jackson effortlessly transitions between speaking tenderly to Steve over the phone and roaring furiously at her colleagues in the background.  


For me, A Touch of Class has become an unexpected highlight of our journey through the Best Actress winners. Like the best of screwball comedies, it’s funny, touching and well-acted, with snappy dialogue and memorable side characters. It’s less than two hours (a rarity for the Academy Awards), and it refuses to comply with stereotypical depictions of genders.


Highlight

Vickie is making dinner for Steve who is yet to arrive. She is irked to find that she has run out of oregano. She nips upstairs to her neighbour, a sex worker:

Vickie: I’m sorry to disturb, but do you have oregano?

Sex worker: Oh I hope not, I got tested last week!


Lowlight

Only that I wanted more of some of the side characters, such as Vickie’s sassy gay assistant or the travel agent who quickly cottons on to Steve’s affair and makes digs at him over the phone. But then, with characters as gloriously funny as these, sometimes less is more.


Mark
9/10


Doug says...

I write this several months after watching the film and so can now only remember fragments of this film, but will attempt to summarise nonetheless. What is most striking about this film is how free and open it is in its discussion of extra-marital affairs, coming after the grey misery of films like 1959’s Room at the Top. We aren’t encouraged to hate or even judge Vickie and Steve for their affair but simply observe. 


And it is masterfully done. The scene where they arrive in their Malaga hotel and he promptly pulls his back muscles is pure comedy, and indeed so much of this film is played farcically and with immense humour. And what’s even more surprising in some ways is that the humour persists today. It feels fresh and uninhibited, and oddly modern in some ways. I appreciated the portrayal of Vickie as a successful career woman (and not punished by the story for it) and how Steve is the one with neuroses.


It also feels like a predecessor to Sex and the City, with honest discussions of sex (Vickie’s world was far from moved) and then the slide into them having a love-nest (which again we aren’t encouraged to judge). 


Glenda Jackson’s performance is superb, channelling the haughtiness of Diana Rigg and the fashionable young woman energy that sits at the heart of more modern films and TV programmes (see: Sex and the City, New Girl, Ugly Betty). It’s why this film feels more recognisable to us and it’s far more interesting than her avant-garde performance in Ken Russell’s Women in Love a few years before. These characters aren’t flawless – far from it – but we enjoy and relish that, rather than attack it. A very interesting take. 


Highlight

The whole of the Malaga trip is comedic and yet tense, with Steve managing unexpectedly bumping into a colleague while with Vickie. Beautifully written, performed and directed.  


Lowlight

I wonder about the ethics of not showing the other side. Steve is married after all – but it’s a small quibble for a film that feels so different and new. 


Mark

9/10



Sunday 18 August 2024

45. Liza Minnelli in 'Cabaret' (1972)

  


Plot Intro

Berlin, the early 1930s (so you know it’s going to get dark at some point). Based on the real experiences of writer Christopher Isherwood, PhD student Brian Roberts (Michael York) arrives to earn a living giving private English tuition. Also living in the guest house is Sally Bowles (Liza Minnelli), who lives a fun-filled, promiscuous, bohemian lifestyle as a singer and performer in the cabaret Kit Kat Club. Their passionate friendship/romance is complicated by Brian struggling with his sexuality, Sally’s unpredictable nature, and the rise of the Nazis…


Doug says...

Liza! Fosse! Choreography! Yes, it’s that time when we get to one of the more famous films in the Best Actress winner canon. Fresh-faced Liza Minnelli roars onto screen as Sally Bowles, and while she’s young, Minelli already had a Tony Award and an Oscar nomination under her belt here. Having been turned down for the original stage role as Sally (considered too inexperienced, it went to Jill Haworth), this is the Liza show - with a side helping of Joel Grey as the lascivious, eerie Emcee. 


I have a particular love of the stage musical of Cabaret, having seen it in 2006 with Anna Maxwell Martin as Sally and Sheila Hancock as Fraulein Schneider and again with Jessie Buckley and Eddie Redmayne in 2021. Both times I went with my mum, who told me all about the history of the play’s setting and discussed lots of details. As she passed away recently, the musical and songs have become even more important to me, as I remember the points we chatted about and the performances we compared. 


Where the stage show flies and this film perhaps slightly stumbles, is in the scenes of decadence, freedom and excess. By cutting the musical’s storyline of Frau Schneider and her Jewish greengrocer suiter, the film feels weaker and a bit under-driven at times. Instead there are long (slightly dull) scenes of Sally and Brian (called Cliff in the stage show) chatting about stuff. The film is also unable to show some of the more risque elements of the stage show, hinting rather than showing. It’s a bit like drag shows - drag queens can get away with darker, funnier, grittier things in a club than they can on a TV show. This Cabaret is oddly sanitised, despite its depiction of mud wrestling and Joel Grey camping it up as much as he bodily can. 


On a rewatch, where the film lifts for me is in the musical numbers which are terrific, even if Minnelli is far too accomplished to be slumming it in a grubby little cabaret venue, and in the Schindler’s List-esque subtleties - we see Sally and Brian walking around the streets and chatting and in the background over the course of the film, posters on walls go from being a bit graffitied with various slogans, to full on Nazi anthems. We see the slow slide into fascism. 


This is not the be all and end all for Cabaret the musical, and while Minnelli is captivating, I do think other actresses have gone on to make the part more compelling. Minnelli simply performs ‘Cabaret’ at the end of the show as an upbeat club number. Since then, actresses have developed it to become a desperate, scrabbling number where we see Sally maybe regretting her choice to stay, and remaining in a land overtaken by Nazism and hatred. We also often now see Sally not being a good singer - which somehow adds to the pathos of the whole thing. How can she actually be successful when she’s not even particularly talented. I’ll never forget Maxwell Martin’s screaming the last few lines into the theatre, or Jessie Buckley’s building to a manic climax. Or just go google Amy Lennox’s performance at the Oliviers for a breathtaking, thought-provoking version. Minnelli’s version next to these just doesn’t stand up any more. 


However where Minnelli does still stand out is in her slick, difficult performances elsewhere in the film. I loved her ‘Mein Herr’ (although cutting ‘Don’t Tell Mama’ is just rude) and there’s no doubt she’s an accomplished showbiz performer. For me, this version of the classic musical is just a bit too dated and pulls short of the productions that have come since.


Highlight

The one song that remains just as powerful on screen as on stage is ‘Tomorrow Belongs To Me’, where we see the people refusing to stand up and join in becoming outnumbered and threatened. 


Lowlight

The whole subplot about the rich duke-friend is just achingly dull. I actually found more of this film duller than I remember.


Mark

6/10


Paul says...

Question: What’s gayer than Liza Minnelli and Michael York in a queer, polyamorous relationship against the backdrop of blonde, leather-clad Nazis? Answer: NOTHING. Being the daughter of Judy Garland and Vincente Minnelli, it stands to reason that Liza should enter show business at age 15, win a Tony award at 19, and win the Best Actress Oscar at 27. Her nearly-seven-decade career then consists of larger-than-life musicals, comedy performances, albums, glitter, show business parties, being imitated by drag queens and raising awareness of HIV/AIDS in a time when no one talked about it. I mean, what else was she going to do other than become a queer icon?


Although Cabaret would end up being her second and last Oscar nomination, there’s no better way to exemplify her unique brand and talent. She is by far the most exuberant, lively, vivacious human being in the whole film and it is a credit to her that she doesn’t descend into over-acting or histrionics. Every movement and line delivery feels spontaneous and I genuinely believed that Sally is an eccentric, happy-go-lucky, but also vulnerable and insecure woman living through an immensely dangerous time.


That said, I agree with Doug that the film can end up dragging and it would be a real slog without Liza. She overshadows everyone except Joel Grey as the Emcee (who also won Best Supporting Actor, deservedly so), and even when she is present there are many scenes outside of the Kit Kat club that feel longer than they are.


I think that director Bob Fosse (one of the biggest and most influential names in the world of musicals, and also won Best Director for this) was aiming to create a stark juxtaposition between the world of the cabaret and the “real” world, shown by his quick, sometimes unexpected cuts and fade outs from one to the other. In the cabaret, life is anarchic, chaotic, unpredictable and fun. In the real world, dialogue is quiet and subdued and there is far more background menace with the subtle increase of Nazi symbols and propaganda in the background. Fosse is very successful in this because it turns the cabaret into an ethereal dream-world that transcends, mocks, softens and hides from the harsh realities of life outside. We never see anyone physically walk from one world to the other- they just appear there. In fact, the Emcee is never seen outside of the cabaret and I had to rack my brains for moments when Sally mentions her job as a cabaret singer whilst outside of the club (she does, but more emphasis is put on her romance with Brian). 


Also, unlike the stage musical, all of the songs (except one) take place as cabaret performances that reflect the action, such as 'Money, Money' accentuating the main characters’ concern with their incomes and 'If You Could See Her' illustrating Brian’s struggle to understand his love for Sally. In the stage musical, some songs take place outside the cabaret and these are either cut or transferred into the Kit Kat Club. The only song that takes place outside of the club is the pseudo-Nazi propaganda song 'Tomorrow Belongs To Me' (which, interestingly, takes place inside the cabaret during the stage musical). I will delve more into this incredible song during my highlight below but it is pertinent that “the Nazi song” (i.e. the one song that would be socially acceptable to sing and perform outside of the sanctuary of the club) is the one that is sung by members of the public, most notably by children. 


All of this creates a film that separates but also celebrates concepts which are coming under fire by alt-right conservatives now- the art of drag, gender fluidity and gay pride. It would be very easy to portray the underworld of the cabaret as dark, sordid, and corrupt (many films like to do this when portraying LGBT nightlife or sex work). But what is striking is that Cabaret portrays the club as a safe space. It’s crazy and somewhat demonic, but queerness, polyamory, sexuality and sex are embraced and celebrated, while the social restrictions of heteronormativity in the real world are depicted on the stage through drag queens with harsh, haphazard, clownish make-up. In the cabaret, anyone can be themselves without fear of harm. In the real world, the Nazis are going after anyone who does not fit their specific Aryan requirements. When Sally ends the tale by singing “Life is a cabaret, old chum, come to the cabaret” she is drawing attention to the fact that life is not and cannot be restrained by the social and religious morals of the “real world”, but humans are actually messy, fluid, exploratory and sexualised beings who can manifest these qualities within the cabaret - and so they should.


Highlight

The song 'Tomorrow Belongs To Me' is truly one of the most poignant and haunting songs in musical theatre history. It starts as a melodic, soft song about nature and the sun sung by an innocent, blue-eyed youth. But the camera slowly pans out to reveal the youth’s Hitler Youth uniform, the beat of the song becomes harsher, punchier, and suddenly the lyrics become threats and predictions of taking control of the Fatherland and the whole world. It is a brief and brilliant portrayal of how a country can slip from patriotism to hate-filled nationalism so quickly.


Lowlight

A dog dies in the film. Unforgivable.


Mark
6/10